Jeffrey Epstein, Google, and the Phantom Tennis Court

First of all the Jeffrey Epstein case is not about Jeffrey Epstein, not to me anyway. Rather it is a stark illustration of U.S. and global politics, power, and control the depth of which most people don’t experience, won’t experience, and don’t want to, ever.

I imagine to many, the Epstein case was a sensational media event they would rather ignore for the most part. It’s not something very important compared to the things the adults in the room should be concerned with in the “real news”, or better yet real life. Yet the media pushed the story anyway for clicks and ratings because thats what the media does. Besides, we all know there are corrupt, sleazy politicians like Bill Clinton and Donald Trump and crazy messed up Hollywood types like Kevin Spacey. We even accept, from time to time they will fall from grace, if they were ever endowed with any, in truly horrific ways. We learned that long ago from O.J. Simpson. Besides, none of it matters anyway because Epstein killed himself in his jail cell two months ago and dammit, we’ve got a president to impeach.

Given all that, is it even appropriate to ask why someone at Google would want to cover up something about the Epstein story? That’s just ridiculous.

Powerful elite and systematic pedophilia blackmail

It’s probably not controversial to say that politics and blackmail often go hand in hand. This notion becomes truly shocking and abhorrent, however when we discover heavily funded, systematic blackmail traps designed with the specific intention of capturing video footage of powerful individuals sexually abusing minors.

This kind of despicable activity has been variously reported on and covered up over the years dating back to the 1930’s and 40’s beginning with organized crime figures like mob boss Meyer Lansky and FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, though earlier operations don’t seem to have involved children so much as adult homosexual relations, (which was scandalous enough in those days to gain the desired leverage). Serena Shimm Award laureate, Whitney Webb has done an outstanding job of documenting the history and numerous connections including that of Jefferey Epstein for Mint Press News in a series of detailed articles. Important here is the existence of substantial evidence that Jeffrey Epstein had long-standing, close connections to both U.S. and Israeli intelligence as well as to organized crime.

Specific evidence as of late was revealed by Vicky Ward writing for the Daily Beast days after Epstein’s July 6, 2019 arrest which ultimately lead to the resignation of Trump administration Labor Secretary, Alexander Acosta. In her article Ward states:

A couple of years ago, I was interviewing a former senior White House official when the name Jeffrey Epstein came up….

Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami who’d infamously cut Epstein a non-prosecution plea deal back in 2007, was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary. The plea deal put a hard stop to a separate federal investigation of alleged sex crimes with minors and trafficking.

Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained… He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,”…

Google connection to intelligence.

In 2015, journalist Nafeez Ahmed published a two-part article on the U.S. Intelligence community’s role in funding and monitoring the development by Stanford University students and later Google founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, of core technologies that when completed would become Google.com.

Like Webb’s coverage of the connection of organized child sex blackmail to the Intelligence Community and the Mob, Ahmed’s articles are lengthy, detailed, and well worth examining. Of particular interest, in part one, Ahmed discusses direction provided by Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham, Dr. Rick Steinheiser in the establishment of Google.

In the late 1990’s, while working for the DARPA funded Mitre corp.,Thuraisingham headed the Massive Digital Data Systems Initiative (MDDS), a project sponsored by the NSA, CIA, and DNI.

Co-authored by Thuraisingham and Steinheiser, a founding document of the MDDS attached to a 2013 article by Thuraisingham states:

“To develop massive digital data systems for the IC [Intelligence Community], several technologies have to be integrated. These include the following: Data management, Knowledge management. Information management, Information visualization, Mass storage management and Distributed processing. The technical focus of the MDDS Initiative is to develop data management technologies. These include developing techniques for querying, browsing, and filtering; transaction processing; accesses [sic] methods and indexing; metadata management and data modeling; and integrating heterogeneous databases; as well as developing appropriate architectures.” 

Funding for the development of the key technologies by Page and Brin, that would eventually become Google, was provided to Stanford University by MDDS.

You’ll notice the above link leads to a 2015 “correction” by Thuraisingham of her own article. This was sparked directly by Ahmed’s attention to it. In it she raises numerous objections stopping just short of denying that “CIA funding was behind Google.” Ahmed provides two updates to part one of his article responding to objections by Dr. Thuraisingham as well as Dr. Steinheiser separately. In the updates Ahmed thoroughly invalidates Thuraisingham’s claims by dissecting her carefully crafted wording and providing documentation showing clear connections between Thuraisingham, Steinheiser, Page, and Brin. Ahmed’s update regarding Steinheiser shows his response to be hostile and intended to intimidate. This is not the approach of someone, falsely accused with the facts on their side.

Ironically, the purpose of the CIA, NSA, DNI, Stanford, Google project is transparently confessed by Thuraisingham herself in that 2013 article.

So now twenty years later, we have moved from Massive Data to Big Data …What is the difference? …the massiveness has changed. From several terabytes to a few petabytes of data back in the 1990s, we have now moved on to several petabytes to exabytes and even zetabytes of data…[b]ecause of the World Wide Web, social media, mobile technologies and developments in the human genome project, as well [as] progress in bioinformatics, geoinformatics, security informatics, and multimedia/video processing, among others. Massive amounts of data about entities and the relationships between them and the evolution of these relationships have to [be] modeled, stored, managed, queried and analyzed. The world population has increased by over 25% in the past 20 years and hundreds of millions of people from all over the world are joining social media…Therefore we need to be able to securely and efficiently handle the zetabytes of data without violating the privacy of individuals…

…I am very pleased to see that not only …the National Science Foundation and the Defense and Intelligence organizations are focusing on big data, practically every large company such as Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Oracle and IBM are starting initiatives. We all have to work together to tackle the big data challenge and make the world a better place to live.

The brazenness of this declaration on how the spy agencies can and will violate your privacy and your rights, for your own good no less, is truly amazing, not to mention the doublespeak of handling “zetabytes of data without violating” your privacy. “Newspeak” is probably more accurate. Incidentally, Thuraisingham posted this article two months before Edward Snowden publicized NSA mass surveillance in dramatic fashion.

There is no tennis court on Jeffrey Epstein’s Little Saint James, Pedophile Island

The following are images from Google Maps and Google Earth alternating with images of the same island, same feature taken from the Apple Maps app.

Little Saint James Island, Googlemaps.com
Little Saint James Island, Apple Maps app
Google Maps
Apple closeup
From Google Earth
Apple maps closeup of non-tennis court

The photos speak for themselves. Is there a tennis court there or not? Obviously, there is not. So why would someone at Google specifically place one there?

This looks to be the highest elevation on the island, it is far away from the house, from drinking water, a shower or shade.

We don’t know exactly when the two images were taken. The Google image has a copyright of 2019 while the Apple image gives no indication. I searched around on-line on how to determine a date or year for Apple Maps images but to no avail. Your mileage may vary.

Just looking at the images, we can surmise the Apple photo is older. On the Google image, directly to the upper lefthand corner of the berm structure there is what looks to be a drainage management project undertaken between the time of the two photos, presumably to prevent erosion of the road as water flows downhill to the retention pond.

So if we accept that the Apple image is older, would it logically follow that Epstein could have had a tennis court built inside that berm area after the Apple image was taken? Not really.

At 0:46 of this July15, 2019, CBS Inside Edition video, the berm enclosure can be clearly seen with no tennis court. The reporter calls it a helipad. It’s not a helipad either. The island has a helipad and it looks like this.

Little Saint James Island helipad

This location is much more convenient to the main residence than the “tennis court” and appears more accommodative to vehicles, provides shelter, etc. However, according to the airfield manager at Grafenweohr (Germany) Army Airfield (GAAF) , there can be a need for a berm around a helipad:

“If we have a situation for example where a Apache AH-64 tries to fire a rocket, …and that rocket doesn’t respond…. “We need to be ready to help them to disarm….The berm acts as a safety clearing barrel for any weapons that are not doing what they should on a helicopter….The newly completed berm will contain a 30mm round, and stop a Hell-fire missile in the event of negligent discharge….”

Grafenweohr was the one and only helipad with a berm I could find in my search. I think it’s fair to say Jeffrey Epstein never had to contend with this situation.

A YouTuber under the pseudonym, Rusty Shackleford posted numerous drone flyover videos of the island taken between 4/21 and 9/12/2019. The interior of the berm area is plain unlike the earlier Apple image and the second video of the two shows it being used as a parking area, with of all things an ambulance among the vehicles.

Little Saint James Island, Rusty Shackleford
An ambulance?: Rusty Shackleford.

There are conspiracy theories on line if you “Google!” “Jeffrey Epstein tennis court”. Here are a couple of links:

Google Covering For Epstein — Showing a Tennis Court Instead of the Human Sacrifice Heiau

What did the tennis court on Epstein Island cover up?

and

https[://]www.neonrevolt.com/2018/04/05/epsteins-island-digs-pizzagate-pedogate-qanon-greatawakening/

This was another relevant link but it wouldn’t post to WordPress as a normal link, Instead I received this error message:

Notice the terms, “pizzagate”, “pedogate”, and “qanon” appear in the html address. I don’t know why it didn’t work but Google isn’t the only one. If it is censorship, it is typical of a type that has been ever more prevalent on line over the past two to three years. The link pasted as text when I bracketed “://“. Remove the brackets and copy and paste into your browser.

All theories, even kooky ones, contain at least some factual information that can be verified, and this story and subject matter being as broad as it is opaque, make any theory worth entertaining. Regardless, none should be censored.

On this post I only wanted to raise the following questions:

What is Google and the National Security State covering up?

Why?

For whom?

Google

Don’t be evil!

An ironic slogan. Interesting that they dropped it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: